Will You Be Eating "Frankenfish" Soon? An Experiment Becomes Food

I can appreciate certain aspects of science because it helps us understand more about the world, ourselves, and it gives us the benefit of technological advances that can improve our living and just make things more fun (video games, gadgets, etc...)

However, in the case of GMO's (Genetically Modified Foods), my question marks are heavy. How do we know what the real intention is behind cross breeding organisms? They claim that it's to feed a growing population; that it's helping us with more sustainable living. But, could it also be another way to control the population via what we eat? Check out this article regarding the "Frankenfish" experiment that's 2 seconds from approval for you to eat... and also see the thought-provoking comment in response to this article below. Your thoughts?

Genetically modified ‘frankenfish’ to appear in US stores

 Regulators with the FDA have released a preliminary report that suggests they will soon give the go-ahead to a team of scientists who’ve created a sci-fi “frankenfish.”

On Friday, the US Food and Drug Administration released an environmental assessment report regarding a salmon-hybrid developed in the laboratories of AquaBounty. The FDA must wait two months before they make final their decision regarding the fate of the frankenfish, but through their study they have determined that the genetically engineered animal, the “AquAdvantage,” is safe enough to be sold.

The fish, a hybrid of the Pacific Chinook salmon and a ray-finned creature called the eelpout, is engineered to grow twice as fast as traditional salmon. Once the frankenfish is approved for good, AquaBounty will be able to offer meatier fish able to feed more people.

“In all other respects,” the company says the AquAdvantage fish is “identical to other Atlantic salmon.”
The AquAdvantage "will not have any significant impacts on the quality of the human environment of the United States,” the FDA wrote, noting additionally that the fish is unlikely to harm populations of natural salmon.

The FDA has 60 days to hear remarks from the public before it makes its final decision. At this point, though, experts weighing in with the Associated Press say the report suggests an approval is all but certain. From there, AquaBounty is likely to release what will be the first genetically engineered animal ever determined safe for human consumption. With no other such animal ever approved in the past, though, concerns have been plentiful over what consequences the creature could spawn.

Bill Freese, a science policy analyst with the Center for Food Safety, told Women’s Health Magazine recently that while the FDA obviously has regulations the fish will have to pass, that process is “totally unlike” how the FDA goes about approving drugs. According to Freese, “a very lax regulatory system” could lead to dire results.“This is a radical new technology. We need very good, careful, close regulation, and we just don't have that. We can't be assured of the safety of any of these genetically engineered organisms,” he said.

Developing the frankenfish has so far cost AquaBounty nearly two decades of research and tens of millions of dollars. Only weeks ago, though, the very fate of the fish was put at risk. While awaiting news from the FDA in early December, AquaBounty CEO Ron Stotish told the Associated Press that length delays had nearly drained the company from all their money. "It's threatening our very survival," Stotish told the AP. "We only have enough money to survive until January 2013, so we have to raise more. But the unexplained delay has made raising money very difficult."

In 2010, the FDA concluded that the AquaAdvantage fish was just as safe as traditional salmon to eat. Only now, however, has it been finally able to release its environmental assessment report, one of the final steps before AquaBounty can be given the green light.

See the article here: http://rt.com/usa/news/genetically-frankenfish-fda-fish-609/

Comment from "Tony":

Even without the health safety, taste, contamination or even the food shortage issues which should be studied further by independent bodies, the problem I have with GMO foods are the patents and copyright laws. Multibillion dollar corporations want to own all the food on the planet and take away our rights to grow and eat what we want.

I'm not against the science behind this nor the benefits of a cheap and sustainable source of nutrition for everyone, but when faceless and lawless super powerful companies push the little guy out of his/her livelihood and force the rest of us to eat their inadequately tested product, it's just wrong.

People think that these new (all encompassing) copyright laws exist to stop people stealing Britney's latest album or Cameron's latest movie... No, it is to give Monsanto and Co, total impunity to feed us whatever they want, when they want and how they want by making it a criminal act to feed ourselves. Not just for individuals, but in many countries worldwide.

No one owns the water or the fish in the sea... People only own the pipes, bottles, boats and trucks that move it to our homes. Stop them from OWNING the food and water before it's too late.